Telangana is born as 29th state, KC Rao takes oath as first CM


Hyderabad, Jun 2 (PTI) Telangana came into existence as the 29th state of India today and TRS supremo K Chandrasekhar Rao (KCR) was sworn in as its first Chief Minister, capping the decades-old struggle in the region for carving out a separate state from Andhra Pradesh.

60-year-old KCR took oath as Chief Minister along with his son K T Rama Rao, nephew T Harish Rao and nine others administered by Governor E S L Narasimhan at Raj Bhavan.

White House turns blind eye on Democrats who oppose climate rules

U.S. President Barack Obama arrives for the commencement ceremony at the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York, May 28, 2014.
(Reuters) - Democrats in Republican-leaning states have a simple strategy for dealing with President Barack Obama's upcoming power plant restrictions before the mid-term elections: Fight them, with the White House's blessing. The new rules, popular with the Democratic Party's base, are one of Obama's highest domestic priorities for his second term. But they are complicating the lives of Democrats in coal and oil-rich states such as West Virginia, Louisiana and Alaska, where candidates are piling on the president and the Environmental Protection Agency for proposing restrictions that could cost jobs locally. With control of the U.S. Senate up for grabs in the November congressional elections, Democrats' hopes of maintaining their majority could rest on the very races where the new energy rules are deeply unpopular. So, the White House is turning a blind eye to attacks from within the party, despite the importance of the regulations to Obama's agenda and post-presidential legacy. "We understand that there are going to be Democrats in these states that oppose it and are perfectly prepared that that's going to happen," one White House official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We don't agree, but we don't have a problem with it." Despite their casual acceptance of Democrats who criticize the climate rules, the administration was not willing to put off releasing the regulations, which are due out on Monday. And strategists inside and outside the White House were preparing to fight hard against the onslaught of criticism from industry, Republicans, and even fellow Democrats. "I can understand how they are positioning themselves in their races. I still think that you end up on the wrong side of history," said Chris Lehane, a strategist for billionaire climate activist Tom Steyer, referring to defecting Democrats. But like White House officials, Steyer, who is spending millions of dollars to advance candidates who support green causes, will not attack those Democrats who oppose the new rules. "We're certainly not going to be helpful to them and their campaigns, but we're also not going to target them," Lehane said. SALES PITCH AND FRUSTRATION The EPA rules will establish mandatory limits on carbon dioxide emissions from power plants, which are among the biggest culprits in producing climate warming emissions. To fight attacks against them, White House officials have viewed ads that are critical of the moves and are trying to shore up support in Congress to thwart Republicans who have pledged to do what they can to rein in the EPA. A sales pitch is also in the works. In a high-profile foreign policy speech on Wednesday, Obama made a point of referencing the fight against global warming, delighting Europeans ahead of the G7 summit next week in Brussels, where Obama will tout the new U.S. rules, according to White House deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes. At home, the White House is selling them by emphasizing the health benefits of cleaning carbon out of the atmosphere. Obama, who will not be present when EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy unveils the regulations on Monday, visited children suffering from asthma at a medical center on Friday and taped his weekly radio address - on climate change - while there. That new public push follows a long campaign by the White House and the EPA to win public and state backing for the controversial proposals. [ID:nL1N0NZ0L6] None of that is helpful to Democrats such as Natalie Tennant, the West Virginia secretary of state and U.S. Senate hopeful, who is campaigning as a "pro-coal" candidate. She said McCarthy had turned down requests to visit her state as part of an outreach tour. "She goes and touts a listening tour and doesn't come to West Virginia, doesn't come to the place and see the people who are impacted," Tennant said in an interview. An EPA spokeswoman said McCarthy had met with leaders from the state despite not having traveled there. That is not enough for Tennant, who, like embattled incumbent Senators Mary Landrieu in Louisiana and Mark Begich in Alaska, is actively distancing herself from Obama. "I am not afraid to stand up to anyone. I'll stand up to the president," she said. But Republican Congresswoman Shelley Moore Capito, who is running against Tennant to replace retiring long-time Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller, argues that the best way to block the EPA rules is to help Republicans gain control of the Senate. "Miners are losing their jobs, families are struggling to make ends meet and there is no relief in sight from the heavy hand of Obama’s EPA," Capito said in a statement. (Additional reporting by Roberta Rampton; Editing by Caren Bohan and Gunna Dickson)

NFL: Last sports bastion of white, male conservatives


By almost any measure — TV ratings, the value of franchises, overall revenue, polls — the National Football League is by far both the most popular and successful professional sports league in America. A veritable juggernaut. Nothing seems to damage that popularity — not widely reported homophobia or the growing awareness of the dangers of head injuries or the accusations leveled in a lawsuit filed last week by 500 former players that they were pumped up with painkillers and sent back onto the field after being injured. Why does the NFL have such a tenacious hold on the national consciousness — particularly that of white males, the primary fans of professional sports? It might be that the NFL, in both its high points and its low ones, encapsulates the prevailing white male conservative ethos of modern America better than any other league. The triumph of the NFL is a tribute to the triumph of American conservatism. The Baltimore Ravens Chris Carr (25) fumbles the opening kickoff as he is hit by the New England Patriots Matt Slater (bottom) in the first quarter of their NFL football game in FoxboroughThe popularity of a sport is, to a large extent, a function of how well it expresses the zeitgeist — at least the male zeitgeist. For more than a century, baseball was America’s national pastime. It was pastoral — born in the 19th century, played on expansive greenswards, with a leisurely pace and a deliberate strategy. All of which was a large part of its appeal in a rapidly modernizing society that surrendered those rural values grudgingly. Basketball was born in Springfield, Massachusetts in 1891 but the professional National Basketball Association arose in the postwar era as an urban game — fluid, loose and improvisational like jazz, not to mention now predominantly black. Both baseball and basketball centralize the individual: baseball with the pitcher and batter squaring off mano-a-mano; basketball with the soloist departing from the ensemble to shoot or dunk. As a result, Major League Baseball and the National Basketball Association are both star leagues in which the players sometimes are as big as the game itself. Football is another thing entirely. It is America’s corporate sport, rising in our industrial heartland. The basis of football is its machinery — 11 individuals subjugating themselves to the greater good of the team. They are effectively cogs, and with their heads encased in helmets, they are faceless in a way that baseball players and basketball players are not. In the case of the linemen, they are not only faceless; they are pretty much nameless as well. There is a reason that the NFL began taking hold in the 1950s — a period of conformity embodied by the term “organization man.” Football players are the ultimate organization men, and their sport is the sport of the corporate age. Still, in a nation as mythically individualistic as ours likes to think it is, it took a while for football to wrest the “national pastime” mantle from baseball. That it finally succeeded is a testament to how much the United States changed in the last half of the 20th century — and how much the NFL played into those changes. Seattle Seahawks Jordan Babineaux recovers a Green Bay Packers fumbleIt isn’t a coincidence that the rise of the National Football League mirrored the rise of American conservatism. In almost every way, the NFL was the league of the well-off, conservative white male. A recent Experian Simmons study shows that this is true demographically. Of people who identified themselves as part of the NFL fan base 83 percent were white, 64 percent were male, 51 percent were 45 years or older, only 32 percent made less than $60,000 a year, and, to finish the point, registered Republicans were 21 percent more likely to be NFL fans than registered Democrats. Another factoid: NFL fans were 59 percent more likely than the average American to have played golf in the last year. You think the NFL is a lunch-bucket league? Not unless the lunch bucket is from Hermes. But football’s appeal is more than demographics. The numbers reflect the values of white conservative males. No professional sport looks more overtly macho than the NFL, and none appears to take greater delight in violence — not even the National Hockey League, which has gone to great lengths to curb fisticuffs. The Michael Sam draft story revealed that none may be more homophobic. Where the National Basketball Association enthusiastically embraced Jason Collins when he announced he was gay, former Vikings punter Chris Kluwe has claimed that that he was released for advocating gay marriage and that his position coach made homophobic slurs. Then are the numerous player tweets against gays, as well as Miami Dolphin lineman and team captain Richie Incognito’s gay taunts against former teammate Jonathan Martin. But the league’s appeal to entrenched conservative values goes deeper still — to the heart of the relationship between labor and capital. No other professional league seems to exhibit the indifference, even contempt, to its own players that the NFL does to its athletes — which is why the former players have filed their suit. The record of concussions and the use of painkillers demonstrate that to the NFL — and many of its fans — players are essentially expendable, interchangeable, to be used up and then discarded. The fact that football players have never established a powerful union, as baseball and basketball players have, only shows how much those players have drunk the league’s Kool Aid. The career of the average NFL player lasts scarcely three years, yet it is the only professional league that doesn’t have guaranteed contracts. Still, the game’s soaring popularity may actually signal the potential waning of those values rather than their power. Just as baseball embedded itself into the national psyche because it captured a sense of the country and then hung on because it represented a pastoral oasis in a frightening new industrializing world, football embedded itself into the national psyche because it captured Ronald Reagan’s America, and it may be thriving among its core fans because it is a last redoubt of white male values now being threatened by changing national demographics and a more tolerant mindset. It is hard to call a league as popular as the NFL an anachronism. But it just may be a place where rich old angry white men can enjoy their world on Sunday — even if that world may be crumbling around them. PHOTO (TOP): New York Giants kicker Lawrence Tynes (C) kicks the opening kick-off to start the first regular season game in the Giants new stadium against the Carolina Panthers in their NFL football game in East Rutherford, New Jersey, September 12, 2010. REUTERS/Gary Hershorn PHOTO (INSERT 1): The Baltimore Ravens Chris Carr (25) fumbles the opening kickoff as he is hit by the New England Patriots Matt Slater (bottom) in the first quarter of their NFL football game in Foxborough, Massachusetts, October 4, 2009. REUTERS/Brian Snyder PHOTO (INSERT): Seattle Seahawks Jordan Babineaux (27) recovers a Green Bay Packers fumble on the opening kickoff in the first quarter of their NFC Divisional NFL playoff football game in Green Bay, Wisconsin, January 12, 2008. REUTERS/John Gress

Once on the edge of defeat, Syria's Assad runs again for president

Syria's President Bashar al-Assad speaks during an interview with Venezuelan state television TeleSUR in Damascus, in this handout photograph distributed by Syria's national news agency SANA on September 26, 2013.
(Reuters) - It was not so long ago that Bashar al-Assad’s enemies thought he was finished. In the summer of 2012, the rebels were not just at the gates of Damascus, but inside the capital, preying on Assad’s harried forces. His government had lost big chunks of Syria’s territory and a string of strategic towns, and a small number of loyal and tested army units were rotating around the country in an exhausting attempt to hold back rebel advances on many fronts. Not any longer. Now, even as the United States seeks to increase aid and training to moderate rebels to fight Assad's forces, U.S. officials privately concede Assad isn’t going anywhere soon. Buoyed by a sequence of victories over the past year, won in large part through Iran and Hezbollah, its Lebanese paramilitary proxy, Assad will be elected president this week for a third seven-year term, symbolically contested by selected opponents playing walk-on roles to pad out the main drama. The old Syria - at its core a security state run by the Assad clan, their Alawite allies and selected partners from other minorities and the Sunni majority - is reasserting itself. Assad himself, who had almost dropped out of sight and, on the rare occasions he did appear in public, looked troubled and strained, has re-emerged looking relaxed, confident and smart as he gets out and about, campaigning with his wife, Asma. TRIUMPHALISM There is a note of triumphalism when he speaks, a sense that the tide of the crisis, that began as a popular revolt against his rule, has turned in his favour. Despite the loss of 160,000 lives and the displacement of 10 million Syrians, the shattering of cities like Homs and Aleppo and wholesale destruction of infrastructure and the economy, Assad proclaims Syria will become again what it once was. During a visit to the ancient Christian town of Maaloula on Easter Sunday, after it had been recaptured from rebels, he told soldiers: “We will remain steadfast and bring security back to Syria and defeat terrorism. We will hit them with an iron fist and Syria will return to how it was.” “The battle may be long but we’re not afraid; Syria has been like that all its life," he said on another stop at nearby Ain al-Tina. “As long as we’re together...we’ll rebuild it. However much they destroy we will rebuild and make it even better.” Such is his confidence that he is contemplating retaking the whole country after the presidential election, according to a Lebanese political ally who sees him regularly. Having regained control of a chain of cities up the north-south backbone of the country, secured his grip on the north-west coast and Alawite heartland, and cleared rebels away from Lebanon's border, he is mulling a new offensive against Aleppo, before pushing right up to the northern frontier with Turkey. According to the Lebanese ally he would leave parts of eastern Syria that are connected to the insurgency in western Iraq under the control of al-Qaeda-linked jihadis - fitting Assad’s contention he is fighting foreign-inspired terrorists. This would also send a warning to Western and Arab supporters of the mainstream rebels that getting rid of him opens the gate to Sunni extremists. REASSERTING CONTROL Diplomats close to Assad acknowledge that part of his strategy has been to overlook the presence of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), an al-Qaeda division led by foreign jihadists, who have been fighting the moderate rebels - the first to rise up against the Syrian leader's rule. "It’s a logical strategy. Why attack ISIL if ISIL is attacking your enemy?," one Arab diplomat said. But Assad will eventually retake even the east, the Lebanese ally confidently predicts, citing the Algerian state’s long and bloody campaign to eradicate Islamist insurgents in the 1990s. "It will take time but Algeria lasted seven to eight years until the government purged the country and regained control," he said. Yet, seductive though this scenario may be to the loyalist camp, Assad has returned from the brink only because powerful foreign allies – Iran, Hezbollah, and Iranian-trained Iraqi militias on the ground and Russia in the UN Security Council - have intervened decisively as the US, Europeans and Arabs have mirrored the indecision and muddle of Syria’s rebel opposition. "Assad has not won, Assad has survived," says Fawaz Gerges, a Middle East expert at the London School of Economics. "There is a big difference between weathering the violent storm and basically defeating the opposition." "Both in his discourse and his image he projects much more confidence, he is much more at ease, he projects a narrative of victory," Gerges says. "The truth is that al Qaeda has damaged the opposition and has strengthened Assad’s hand." "But the fact is the opposition is divided but not defeated yet. You have between 70,000 and 100,000 fighters and we have to wait and see how the opposition, and how the United States, Western powers and regional allies play their cards." PYRRHIC VICTORY? Lebanese columnist Sarkis Naoum, a Syria expert who from the start predicted a long conflict, says Assad has won "the first half" of the conflict. "It is a pyrrhic victory. The scale is on Bashar and Iran’s side now but for sure Bashar won’t be able to win the overall war." While there are indications that the U.S. and its allies are beginning to worry more about an al-Qaeda revival in Syria than about removing Assad, Western diplomats say, there is also evidence Washington is encouraging Saudi Arabia to provide selected rebel units with more sophisticated anti-tank weapons and Qatar to upgrade their skills with military training. U.S. President Barack Obama, facing criticism that he has been passive and indecisive on Syria, said last week that he would work with Congress to "ramp up support for those in the Syrian opposition who offer the best alternative to terrorists and brutal dictators" but he offered no specifics. While Obama and Congress deliberate, the dominant fear remains the absence of a credible alternative to take over power from Assad, whose family has ruled Syria ruthlessly for over 40 years. Instead, they see a scenario under which the country of 23 million people may go the way of Iraq or Libya. At home, Assad is fond of telling foreign journalists that he and his wife continue to move around Damascus freely and without personal security. But locals say that has not happened since the uprising erupted in March 2011. Security surrounding Assad’s movements is so tight that even at official ceremonies, it is not clear if the footage shot is of the same day or a previous day, they say. One close observer noted that Assad doesn’t tell his guards in advance about his movements. "He suddenly emerges and they run after him to follow movement orders on the spot," he said. CLOSE TO HOME Mortars continuously hit close to Assad’s private residence in Damascus, residents who live in the area say. During a recent mortar barrage that came unusually close to his residence, neighbours say they saw several cars with darkened windows leave from a basement. "It was so fast, almost instantaneous. We heard the mortar blast, which we felt in our home. It shook our windows. And by the time I walked up to the window to see what was happening, I saw maybe 10 cars leave from his residence, one after the other, all of them in a big hurry," one resident said. Locals along the Syrian coast say Assad and his family have not been to their summer residence for at least two years. Western diplomats say that about a year into the uprising, "Assad must have gotten advice from his friends not to leave Damascus as it is the ultimate prize for the rebels". Under all scenarios, experts say a military solution to oust Assad is out of the question and, barring an assassination, a nuclear deal between Iran and major powers could in the long-term be the only way forward to usher a post-Assad order. "He's staying until someone puts a bullet in his head or until the regional equation changes and this won't happen until a nuclear deal is reached," said the Arab diplomat. Another diplomat with close links to Assad admitted that the president, 48, is the man of the moment but not the future. "He’s not perfect, and he could be more flexible on humanitarian issues. Besides, he won’t be around forever, and Syria will eventually move forward. But for now, he’s the better of the two choices," the diplomat said. But die-hard loyalists close to Iran strongly believe Tehran will stand by its friend, whose alliance is a vital land bridge giving the non-Arab Persian state access to Hezbollah, its proxy militia fighting Israel from Lebanon. "God forbid when his situation was worse than this, the Iranians did not give him up, they won't now." (Additional reporting by a correspondent in Damascus and Dominic Evans in Beirut; editing by Janet McBride)

Republicans question U.S. prisoner swap with Taliban

A sign of support of Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl is seen in Hailey, Idaho June 1, 2014.
(Reuters) - U.S. politicians questioned whether the deal that freed Bowe Bergdahl in exchange for five Taliban militants amounted to a negotiation with terrorists as the U.S. soldier was flown out of Afghanistan to a military hospital in Germany on Sunday. Army Sergeant Bergdahl, held for nearly five years in Afghanistan, was freed in a deal with the Taliban brokered by the Qatari government. Five Taliban militants, described by Senator John McCain as the "hardest of the hard core," were released from the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and flown to Qatar. While Bergdahl's released on Saturday was celebrated by his family and his hometown, and could be seen as a coup for President Barack Obama as he winds down America's longest war, McCain and other Republicans questioned whether the administration had acted properly in releasing the militants. "These are the highest high-risk people. Others that we have released have gone back into the fight," said McCain, a former prisoner of war and Vietnam War veteran. "That's been documented. So it's disturbing to me that the Taliban are the ones that named the people to be released." he said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” As the Obama administration sought to counter the criticism, Bergdahl was flown to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany for medical treatment. After receiving care he would be transferred to another facility in San Antonio, Texas, U.S. defense officials said, without giving a date for his return to the United States. U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said he hoped the exchange might lead to breakthroughs in reconciliation with the militants and rejected accusations from Republicans that it resulted from negotiations with terrorists, saying the swap had been worked out by the government of Qatar.(Full Story) "We didn't negotiate with terrorists," Hagel said in an interview on NBC's "Meet the Press". "As I said and explained before, Sergeant Bergdahl was a prisoner of war. That's a normal process in getting your prisoners back." Bergdahl, 28, was handed over on Saturday to U.S. forces who had flown in by helicopter. The Taliban said they had released Bergdahl near the border with Pakistan in eastern Afghanistan. SLOW RECOVERY His parents, Bob and Jani Bergdahl, told a news conference on Sunday they had not yet spoken to their son and were aware of the long task ahead as he adapts to being free, saying he needed time to decompress. (Full Story) "It is like a diver going deep on a dive and he has to stage back up through recompression to get the nitrogen bubbles out of the system. If he comes up too fast, it could kill him," his father said. Bergdahl, from Idaho, was the only known missing U.S. soldier in the Afghan war that began soon after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the United States to force the Taliban - accused of sheltering al Qaeda militants - from power. He was captured in unknown circumstances in eastern Afghanistan on June 30, 2009, about two months after arriving in the country. Many U.S. government officials believe Bergdahl was seized after walking away from his unit in violation of U.S. military regulations. But U.S. officials have indicated there is little desire to pursue any disciplinary action against him given what he has been through. His release followed years of on-off negotiations and suddenly became possible after harder-line factions of the Afghan Taliban shifted course and agreed to back it, U.S. officials said. (Full Story)] A senior Gulf source confirmed that the five released Taliban militants had arrived on Sunday in Doha, capital of Qatar, the Gulf emirate that acted as intermediary in the negotiations. They would not be permitted to leave Qatar for a year, the source said, adding that their families had been flown from Afghanistan. U.S. officials said the restrictions placed on them included monitoring of their activities. Those assurances were greeted with scepticism by U.S. Republicans and some Afghan officials, who voiced concerns that the men would rejoin the insurgency. (Full Story) "They will be very dangerous people, because they have connections with regional and international terror organizations around the world," a senior Afghan intelligence official said. In Washington, some Republicans suggested the administration had bypassed a legal requirement to notify Congress 30 days in advance about prisoner releases from Guantanamo and said the deal amounted to a negotiation with terrorists. Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas called it a "dangerous price" to pay. But Obama's national security adviser, Susan Rice, said the administration was concerned about Bergdahl's health and upheld a "sacred obligation" to return soldiers from the battlefield. "We had reason to be concerned that this was an urgent and an acute situation, that his life could have been at risk," Rice said on ABC's "This Week." "We did not have 30 days to wait. And had we waited and lost him, I don't think anybody would have forgiven the United States government." 'HIGH RISK' Some members of the U.S. Congress worried even before the prisoner exchange took place over the release of the five, particularly of Mohammed Fazl, a "high-risk" detainee who is alleged to be responsible for the killing of thousands of Afghanistan's minority Shi'ite Muslims between 1998 and 2001. A U.S. defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, identified the five men as Fazl, Mullah Norullah Noori, Mohammed Nabi, Khairullah Khairkhwa and Abdul Haq Wasiq. Pentagon documents released by the WikiLeaks organization said all five were sent to Guantanamo in 2002. They were classified as "high-risk" and "likely to pose a threat" to the United States, its interests and allies. According to leaked U.S. diplomatic cables, Noori, for example, was a senior Taliban military commander wanted by the U.N. for possible war crimes and Wasiq was a Taliban deputy minister of intelligence who was a central figure in the group's alliance with other Islamic fundamentalist groups. The prisoner exchange deal came days after Obama outlined a plan on Tuesday to withdraw all but 9,800 American troops from Afghanistan by the end of the year and the remainder by 2016, ending more than a decade of U.S. military engagement. (Additional reporting by Mirwais Harooni and Jessica Donati in Kabul, David Brunnstrom in Bagram, Amena Bakr in Doha and Missy Ryan, David Morgan, Phil Stewart and Bill Trott in Washington; Writing by Alex Richardson and Jim Loney; Editing by Jeremy Laurence, Lynne O'Donnell and Frances Kerry)

KKR wins IPL 7 title

KKR has won its second title chasing Punjab for a 200 run score. Manish Pandey(96), became the hero of the match with Yusuf Pathan playing an exciting knock.
Kolkata Knight Riders captain Gautam Gambhir won the toss in the IPL final and predictably - as most teams do at the Chinnaswamy Stadium - chose to chase. His Kings XI counterpart George Bailey was undecided about what he would have done, but both captains agreed the pitch was a belter and would remain so for the whole game. Knight Riders named an unchanged XI from the team that beat Kings XI in the first qualifier to secure a finals berth. Kings XI made one change, to their seam attack, replacing Sandeep Sharma with L Balaji, who was playing his first final despite being part of two winning squads. Sandeep had conceded 32 in three overs in the second qualifier against Chennai Super Kings. Batting second has been the preferred strategy at this venue - teams have decided to do so 35 times in 42 previous IPL games. The results have not vindicated that approach though: the team batting first has won 23 games in Bangalore, while the chasing side has won 17. Knight Riders and Kings XI have played each other three times already this season, with Gambhir's team enjoying a 2-1 advantage. Kings XI took the first match in Abu Dhabi, and Knight Riders won the next two in Cuttack and in Kolkata. In all three games, Knight Riders were able to keep Kings XI's powerful batting order in check. The pitch in Bangalore, however, is likely to be the most batting friendly surface these sides have faced each other on this season. Kolkata Knight Riders: 1 Robin Uthappa (wk), 2 Gautam Gambhir (capt), 3 Manish Pandey, 4 Shakib Al Hasan, 5 Yusuf Pathan, 6 Ryan ten Doeschate, 7 Suryakumar Yadav, 8 Piyush Chawla, 9 Sunil Narine, 10 Morne Morkel, 11 Umesh Yadav. Kings XI Punjab: 1 Virender Sehwag, 2 Manan Vohra, 3 Glenn Maxwell, 4 David Miller, 5 Wriddhiman Saha (wk), 6 George Bailey, 7 Akshar Patel, 8 Mitchell Johnson, 9 Karanveer Singh, 10 L Balaji, 11 Parvinder Awana

Women FA Cup: Everton v Arsenal - Preview



"I've said to the girls that there's no doubt in my mind we've got one of the most talented squads in the country so I'm pretty sure that before too long they will get a result that can kick-start the season."
Shelley Kerr's reign in charge of Arsenal Ladies will come to an end after Sunday's FA Cup final against Everton but, according to the Scottish coach, victory at stadiummk could be the launchpad for this new-look side to reinstate themselves as the team to beat in England.
It's been a turbulent first half to the campaign for the Gunners. They sit bottom of the Women's Super League with just one point from four games but have showed signs of their potential with a promising run to another cup final. Two wins inside a week against a highly-fancied Birmingham and a much-improved Chelsea sealed their place in the showpiece for the 14th time.
Kerr's imminent departure was announced last Sunday and the search has begun for a new boss before the season resumes on June 29. So it's one last hurrah for Kerr and the Scot is delighted with the focus her squad have displayed in the build up to the final.
The focus this week has been solely on the cup final and we want our preparations to go really well
"We met early on Tuesday and it was good to have a small chat about things," Kerr told Arsenal.com. "I have to say the girls have been fantastic this week. They're excited and they can't wait for Sunday to come. We've had a video analysis session together on Friday and we've got one more training session. The mood's great and we're ready to go.
"The first couple of days after Sunday's game there was lots of chat about my personal situation but the focus this week has been solely on the cup final and we want our preparations to go really well and to do that you have to have no distractions."
Everton have been equally impressive in the competition this year, beating Cardiff, local rivals Liverpool and Notts County en route to the final. But Andy Spence's side have also struggled in the league and sit just a point and one place above the Gunners in the table.
The Merseysiders are going for their second win in the competition - their maiden victory came four years ago at the expense of Arsenal after a dramatic match that went to extra-time. Only four players in the current squad were involved that day but Kerr believes the memories could play a part on Sunday

"You would think that previous experience would work either way because Everton beat us in a cup final four years ago and some of the girls played in that," she said. "There's experience of winning, losing and not getting to a cup final. All these things help your development as a player.
"Everton have done fantastic in the last few years. Firstly under Mo Marley and then Andy Spence. They produce very talented young players but they have experience as well who have been here before and have played at the top level.
"In attack they're very strong and in Nikita Paris they have one of the best young players in the country in my opinion. She's got pace, she's got vision and an eye for goal. She's an all-round intelligent footballer. They've got experience in terms of Rachel Brown and Jodie Handley so they've got a the right mix.
"But we have got a few that have been there and done it before but it just comes down to who performs their best on the day."
                                                                                       Source Arsenal.com